« Reflection on Final Project | Main | Plans for My Final Project »

Reading Keats

The wonders of the imagination during transitional periods of consciousness.

Was it a vision, or a waking dream?/Fled is that music--do I wake or sleep?

Through such melodious verses as these, Keats brings to light (and dramatizes) questions about the blur between what is "real" (what one senses as events that happen in the awake state) and what is part of the dream-world that we all know. In the verses above, he questions the observations he has just made about the curious "light-winged Dryad," the happy, singing nightingale that he is so fond of. It is mainly because of the beauty of its song, as well as the pastoral, mythical beauty it makes him think of, that makes him wonder about the experience so much. In addition, his hallucinatory state of mind, which he reflects upon, also makes him question the validity of his experience.

The questions and experience that Keats presents "Ode to a Nightingale" are questions that have been asked and situations that have been experienced for centuries. Is our world always what it seems: awake and alive with experience? Or is what we perceive as reality--our waking consciousness--really just part of our dreams--part of that altered state of consciousness known as sleep?

Interestingly enough, Keats compares the stage of transition of falling asleep to being on a substance, even to being poisoned: My heart aches, and a drowsy numbness pains/My sense, as though of hemlock I had drunk,/Or emptied some dull opiate to the drains/One minute past, and Lethe-wards had sunk...(l.1-4). In the third line, one can see that he is comparing his foggy, forgetful state of mind (and consciousness) to being on opiates, drugs that are known to induce sleep and even produce hallucinations.

However, the second line gives a darker comparison: he feels as if he has drunk hemlock, a poisonous plant substance that is known to have killed Socrates in the ancient world. The awake-sleep transition, to Keats, felt like dying--crossing the line between life and death.

In connection to this idea, one must note that Keats mentions "Lethe" right after this particular comparison. "Lethe" refers to the river of forgetfulness (among the five rivers of Hades--the underworld) and as a river around the Cave of Sleep that induces drowsiness in Roman mythology. Clearly, there is not only one correct way to define "Lethe" as used in this poem. However, if the first definition is brought under consideration, the closeness between death and the state of altered consciousness (especially in terms of memory) is being highlighted to a great extent with these verses. The use of such mythological reference, in addition to the reference to hemlock (and even the opiates, since another thing that they induce is death, if taken in large enough quantities) shows that Keats indeed relates falling asleep and dying from the beginning, using this to frame his entire poem and to introduce such ideas about consciousness. The second also fits into the theme of drug-induced states of consciousness, but not necessarily the relationship between death and such states (although it may: during ancient times, as with the present day, sleep and death were closely related).

So why is this connection being made in the context of this poem? Keats hints at an answer: he mentions in the third stanza how the persona experiences sadness through experiencing sickness and watching others die and age throughout his present and past life. The only final escape there is is through death, which he mentions as being "half in love" with (because he would not be able to experience the nightingale's song again). However, through the song of the nightingale, the man finds relief. It is a song that takes him into a mythical dreamworld that seems to exist in his own mind: a temporary "death" that brings him away from the plights of the temporal world into a place of eternal beauty.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mtblogs.qc.cuny.edu/mt-tb.cgi/5372

Comments (2)

I think you're absolutely right that Keats makes a connection between various altered states of consciousness (sleep, drug-induced states, the lulling he experiences listening to the nightingale)--and that he makes an analogy between these and death. Of course, none of these states is deat; they're far less absolute. The analogy makes it a lot easier to romanticize death, by attributing to it the kind of escape from the daily (or bodily) burdens and pain that altered states can perform. If we follow Steen's line of argument, this happens through Keats's creation of a "virtual agent" that allows him to "inhabit" an imagined death, which lacks the finality of actual death.

Maryellen:

Well, I like your analysis, and I can agree with you and Prof. T. up to a point. But I would add that Keats is saying that he would be content to die in the state of bliss, during a peak moment of experience, as he listens to the song of the nightingale--that it would be enough to have ended there and he is half willing to give up the quotidian day-to-day to go out in such a blaze of glory.

I would also add that the nightingale is a symbol of "eternal nature" which never changes and which is not subject to death, decay, and destruction. In that way, Keats envies the nightingale. The nightingale is also a symbol of the peak experience, which is perhaps what makes all the rest bearable and worth going through.

Maryellen

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 14, 2007 5:34 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Reflection on Final Project.

The next post in this blog is Plans for My Final Project.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 1.02