« Hearts and Minds | Main | Lessons from a label maker »
I agree with everyone's comments that the lack of an interpreter is completely ridiculous. In this case, it isn't just a problem of consent, though. The lack of understanding also majorly impacted patient care, and seemingly, the whole reason to push for consent is to be able to provide the patient with the proper care.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mtblogs.qc.cuny.edu/mt-tb.cgi/4314
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 15, 2007 9:39 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Hearts and Minds.
The next post in this blog is Lessons from a label maker.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (2)
Unfortunately, sometimes I feel that providers view the consent process as a way to cover themselves legally. When I was doing translating work, I observed that the providers were more concerned with if I had obtained the patient’s signature and not if the patient had understood what was told to them or if they had any questions.
Posted by Jenny Ly | October 16, 2007 4:35 AM
Posted on October 16, 2007 04:35
Agree. I had a similar experience doing translation for a relative who was in ICU. The medical coordinator was more concerned about getting the patient’s signature so they could proceed with the blood transfusion. They didn’t care if the patient truly understood the risks involved. They even tried making him sign the papers before I finished explaining the procedures.
Posted by Po Lai Yau | October 18, 2007 11:52 PM
Posted on October 18, 2007 23:52